.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

The World Unleashed

The Rantings of an unkown prophet can be found here; where no topic is safe! The resident savant will lead you thru the world as he sees it. Not an easy life, but one that MUST be shared, if the mission to "enlighten" is to reach fruition. Commentaries on religion, Catholicism, politics, abortion, evolution, sports, baseball, mets, yankees, entertainment, TV, american idol etc. can all be found here. enjoy it, hate it, come back often, send me your comments. all are welcome

My Photo
Name:

dont let my 1912 birthday bother you, i was born on feb. 29th so i only have birthdays every 4 years. so im only 26

Google
WWW http://allworldviews.blogspot.com/

Friday, March 30, 2007

Chocolate Jesus

I think the uproar over the chocolate jesus must be because he was naked, totally naked, and, i understand, anatomically correct!  What else
could there  be an uproar over?  They already have chocolate crosses during easter. They have chocolate bunnies & Santas too during xmas. Sure I know there is a huge difference between jesus and santa, but my point is if its done in good taste (pardon the pun) where is the harm?  
I'll bet you right now if we mass produced little chocolate jesus' during easter, a whole lot more kids would know about him in the same way they now know and associate easter with the easter bunny now.
 Yes the nakedness was what ruined it i think. What was the "artist"(?) thinking?  Did he deliberately make the jesus nude to offend people? Although I havent seen the statue my self, i would, unfortunately have to say yes, he probably did want to offend. What a shame. It might have otherwise been an interesting idea.  story here.

Addendum: further research revealed there are also already chocolate jesus  so obviously it is about the nakedness, which in itself is a shame because god created us naked and that is the way we were meant to be.


Monday, March 26, 2007

Drugs for 'good' cholesterol fail tests

The hot new strategy of trying to prevent heart disease by raising good cholesterol had more setbacks Monday as new studies showed that experimental drugs didn't work and also had safety problems. Continued Here

Most angioplasties unneeded, study finds


More than half a million people a year with chest pain are getting an unnecessary or premature procedure to unclog their arteries because drugs are just as effective, suggests a landmark study that challenges one of the most common practices in heart care. The stunning results found that angioplasty did not save lives or prevent heart attacks in non-emergency heart patients.
An even bigger surprise: Angioplasty gave only slight and temporary relief from chest pain, the main reason it is done.
"By five years, there was really no significant difference" in symptoms, said Dr. William Boden of Buffalo General Hospital in New York.
Continued Here

Rare Semi-Identical Twins Discovered



Rare Semi-Identical Twins Discovered





Thursday, March 22, 2007

Oldest Chunks of the Earth Ever Found

The oldest known chunk of Earth's crust has been found in Greenland, and dates back at least 3.8 billion years.

n 2001, researchers analysed the most ancient examples of rock ever discovered . The tiny crystals of near-indestructible zircon were dated at 4.4 billion years old.

Crocodile Unearthed in Oregon

The fossil of an ancient amphibious reptile with a crocodile's body and a fish's tail has been unearthed in Oregon. Scientists believe the creature's remains were transported by geologic processes nearly 5,000 miles away from where it originally died more than 100 million years ago.
The reptile roamed a tropical environment in Asia about 142 to 208 million years ago. Called a Thalattosuchian, the amphibious creature [image] represents an early milestone in evolutionary history, marking a transition during which these reptiles moved from being semi-aquatic to wholly ocean species
The rock-entombed animal migrated eastward from perhaps Japan via continental drift, a theory of land movement in geological time, suggests William Orr, part of the fossil-discovery team and director of the Thomas Condon State Museum of Fossils at the University of Oregon.
During ancient times, the Pacific Ocean was much wider than it is today, and Orr suggests the rocky ride could have taken as long as 100 million years before reaching North America.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20070321/sc_livescience/jurassiccrocodileunearthedinoregon

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Mandatory Ultrasound

There is a new anti abortion "plan"  that i agree with.
it calls for showing the woman a  mandatory ultrasound before she can get an abortion. i think thats a fair requirement and IF it causes her 
to change her mind then thats great because she would prolly have regretted it later on anyway. For those who can still go thru with the
 abortion thats also ok with me. At least she knows the full details of what she is doing.

Of course it also not exactly fair  BUT ONLY in the sense that day in & day out we all go about our lives without knowing the full story on most things. Take two examples if you will -  WAR;  if we saw actual footage of the daily horrors of war it would make the average person sick and we would never enter into a war except as a dire last resort which is as it should be anyway. Second if all terminally ill people would see a video of what their remaining time would be like before actually dying, based on their individual illness, well then im afraid many more would choose euthanasia, especially for some of the more painful cancers and such.  but having said this i still the the pre abort ultrasound is a great idea.  Of course i also think the father should have a say, but he never will.

Monday, March 19, 2007

NIH Chief: Stem Cell Ban Hobbles Science


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070319/ap_on_sc/stem_cells_2

Man Invents Machine To Cure Cancer

http://www.fox5vegas.com/health/11125917/detail.html

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice

i dont know if this is true at all , but like global warming, its worth learning about and remembering JUST IN CASE it is true....


Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice

David McRaney
Issue date: 1/23/07 Section: Opinion


EDITORS NOTE:

Since the original publication of this article we have been inundated with responses from the public at all walks of life. It is important to note that research is ongoing with DCA, and not everyone is convinced it will turn out to be a miracle drug. There have been many therapies that were promising in vitro and in animal models that did not work for one reason or another in humans. To provide false hope is not our intention. There is a lot of information on DCA available on the web, and this column is but one opinion on the topic. We hope you will do your own research into the situation. So, we have added links to resources at the end of this column. If you are arriving here form a linking website like Fark, then those links will not appear because they tend to grab only the text. For those visitors, here is a link to the original research: www.depmed.ualberta.ca/dca

END NOTE

Scientists may have cured cancer last week.

Yep.

So, why haven't the media picked up on it?

Here's the deal. Researchers at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada found a cheap and easy to produce drug that kills almost all cancers. The drug is dichloroacetate, and since it is already used to treat metabolic disorders, we know it should be no problem to use it for other purposes.

Doesn't this sound like the kind of news you see on the front page of every paper?

The drug also has no patent, which means it could be produced for bargain basement prices in comparison to what drug companies research and develop.

Scientists tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body where it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but left healthy cells alone. Rats plump with tumors shrank when they were fed water supplemented with DCA.

Again, this seems like it should be at the top of the nightly news, right?

Cancer cells don't use the little power stations found in most human cells - the mitochondria. Instead, they use glycolysis, which is less effective and more wasteful.

Doctors have long believed the reason for this is because the mitochondria were damaged somehow. But, it turns out the mitochondria were just dormant, and DCA starts them back up again.

The side effect of this is it also reactivates a process called apoptosis. You see, mitochondria contain an all-too-important self-destruct button that can't be pressed in cancer cells. Without it, tumors grow larger as cells refuse to be extinguished. Fully functioning mitochondria, thanks to DCA, can once again die.

With glycolysis turned off, the body produces less lactic acid, so the bad tissue around cancer cells doesn't break down and seed new tumors.

Here's the big catch. Pharmaceutical companies probably won't invest in research into DCA because they won't profit from it. It's easy to make, unpatented and could be added to drinking water. Imagine, Gatorade with cancer control.

So, the groundwork will have to be done at universities and independently funded laboratories. But, how are they supposed to drum up support if the media aren't even talking about it?

All I can do is write this and hope Google News picks it up. In the meantime, tell everyone you know and do your own research.

PLEASE READ THE EDITOR'S NOTE AT THE TOP OF THIS COLUMN, AND PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINKS TO OTHER DCA RESOURCES LISTED DIRECTLY UNDER THIS COLUMN.

This is a column of opinion written by Printz Executive Editor David McRaney. Comments can be sent to printz@usm.edu

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Microwaves: Modern Miracle or Menace

http://www.alive.com/1403a4a2.php?subject_bread_cramb=449

Microwaves: Modern Miracle or Menace
by author Croft Woodruff, MH (Hon.)

North America's obsession with the oh-so-quick and convenient microwave may be pushing us from the frying pan into the fire. An estimated one out of every two households has a microwave oven. Modern cookbooks abound with recipes for cooking with this handy device. Yet an increasing body of evidence is calling into question the safety of one of our favourite kitchen appliances.

History of the Microwave

Microwave ovens were introduced into the market for domestic use in the early 1970s. At that time, they were considered relatively safe if properly cleaned and with door seals well maintained to prevent leakage. There was but a hint that their safety and the nutritional values of microwaved foods weren't what the public believed. However, in 1989, Dr. Hans-Urich Hertel, a Swiss food scientist, and professor Bernard Blanc of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology began conducting extensive research on the effects of microwaved food on humans. Using a carefully controlled protocol, nine people, including Dr. Hertel, were alternately exposed to microwaved and conventionally cooked foods from organic sources. Samples of participants' blood were taken right before eating and at certain intervals after eating.

Researchers found that after microwaved food consumption, there was significant reduction of all blood hemoglobin and cholesterol values (both good HDL cholesterol and bad LDL cholesterol), and that bad cholesterol levels were elevated relative to good cholesterol levels.

Lymphocyte (white blood cell) activity decreased notably after ingestion of microwaved foods compared to that of non-treated foods. When exposed to blood from those who had eaten microwaved foods, bacteria that glow when examined under a special light glowed much brighter than when exposed to blood samples from those who had eaten non-treated food. This established an association that energy from microwaved foods may be passed on to those who consume the food.

Free Radical Effects

There were non-thermal effects that altered cell membrane permeability, making cells susceptible to invasion by bacteria, fungi and viruses. Other adverse effects included the change of cells from a healthy aerobic (oxidation) status to an unhealthy anaerobic (fermentation) condition. Anaerobic cells produce damaging free radicals such as hydrogen peroxide and carbon mono-xide, which increase the need for neutralizing antioxidants in the body such as vitamins A, C, E and selenium.

Dr. Hertel holds that when food is microwaved, the oven exerts a massive power input that destroys and deforms food molecules and produces new "radiolytic" compounds unknown in nature. Exposing food to ionizing rays such as gamma or X-rays (irradiation) creates URPs (unique radiolytic products) in the food. URPs have free-rad-ical capabilities that destroy healthy cells and contribute to abnormal growth, a cause of cancer. Conventional wisdom has contended that microwaves are non-ionizing. Dr. Hertel's evidence would appear to contradict that notion.

Decreased Nutritional Value

Other problems reported with microwaved foods include the destruction of nutritional value of meat proteins, lowered metabolic activity of important plant substances such as alkaloids, glucosides, galctosides and nitrilosides, and reduced bioavailability of certain vitamins and minerals, which affects the body's ability to absorb these nutrients.

Pediatrics (1992; 89: 667-9) reported heating or thawing human milk at low temperatures of 20 to 53 degrees Celsius reduces the level of infection-fighting factors in milk. Another study found microwaving milk at temperatures in excess of 72 C caused a significant decrease in all of its infection-fighting factors. The authors strongly objected to the use of microwaved human milk in hospitals.

The Journal of Natural Science (1998; 1: 2-7) reported a Tulsa, Oklahoma, patient who died of anaphylactic shock as a result of a transfusion of blood warmed in a microwave. Microwaves appeared to have altered the blood sufficiently to cause the death of the patient.

A study published in Lancet (1989; 913: 92-3) demonstrated high rates of change in microwaved food proteins not seen with conventional cooking. The authors warned that such effects on amino acids could be hazardous and "can lead to structural, functional and immunological changes."


The Journal of the American College of Nutrition (1994; 13: 209-10) reported that although the quantity of proteins changed were small, microwaving infant formula can produce molecular changes in the amino acid components in milk proteins that cause toxicity and compromise the nutritional value of the formula.

Another problem with microwaving food is the migration of chemicals from packaging materials into food.

More Research

Dr. Hans-Urich Hertel was not the first to investigate the health effects of microwaved food. Scientists in the former Soviet Union had been doing so 30 years earlier. According to William Kopp in the Journal of Natural Science (1998; 1: 42-43), from 1957 to 1999, researchers experimenting with microwaves at the Institute of Radio Technology at Klinsk in Byelorussia found that prepared meats, cereal grains, root vegetables and milk heated in a microwave created cancer-causing agents in these foods. Ingestion of microwaved foods caused a higher percentage of cancerous cells in blood. Disorders of the digestive system were associated with chemical changes in the ingested microwaved foods. These chemical alterations were also associated with a statistically higher incidence of stomach and intestinal cancers with degeneration of peripheral cellular tissues and a breakdown of digestive, urinary and bowel excretion among those who consumed such foods. Microwaved foods caused malfunctions in the lymphatic system's capacity to protect itself against growing tumours. Such findings caused microwaves to be banned in Russia in 1976. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the ban was lifted.

While microwave cooking has been demonstrated to cause significant decreases in nutritional value of all foods studied, what about reheating previously microwaved food? The practice of reheating leftover food further compromises nutrient quality and content. Microwaved foods also offer no better protection from food-borne illnesses than conventional cooking. Reheating food in a microwave is potentially dangerous, according to researchers in the American Journal of Epidemiology (1994; 139: 903-9) investigating a salmonella outbreak among 30 picnickers who took home leftover meat. All 10 who used a microwave to reheat the meat became ill. None who used a skillet or regular oven to reheat the meat became ill.

Pass on the Plastic

Another problem with microwaving food is the migration of chemicals from packaging materials into food. The PVC (polyvinylchloride) plastic film that covers foods during microwaving has been shown to release plasticizers to such an extent that it has been recommended that PVC not be in direct contact with the food.

In microwaving breakfast cereals sold in convenient waxed packaging for heating, 60 per cent of the wax was transferred to the food in spite of strict adherence to instructions (Food Additives and Contaminants, 1994; 11: 79-89).

To enhance the appearance and flavour of prepared foods for microwaving, the food industry has developed specialized synthetic food additives. According to Australian researchers Ashton and Laura (The Perils of Progress, Zed Books, 1999): "An example of one new type of flavour-producing technology designed for use in microwave ovens is 'susceptors.' These devices are usually glued to the packaging of microwavable foods and are used to achieve local areas of high temperature. This has the effect of browning the food during microwave cooking. A subtle side-effect of some of the pre-1992 susceptor devices involved the release of small amounts of a toxic chemical, bisphenol-a-diglycidyl ether (BADGE), into the food during microwaving. BADGE was a component of the adhesive used to fix susceptors to packaging." The authors then cited a 1992 study that showed the chemical was found to migrate in the food when cooked according to instructions (Food Additives and Contaminants, 1995; 17: 79-87).

To the shame of Switzerland as a democracy, Dr. Hertel was essentially gagged by Swiss microwave oven manufacturers through the use of trade laws and the courts. In 1994, the Swiss Federal Court confirmed an earlier conviction against Dr. Hertel with the levy of a fine of 8,000 Swiss francs and the threat of imprisonment. In August 1998, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss Court's verdict was in contravention of the Human Rights Code and ordered Switzerland to pay Dr. Hertel 40,000 Swiss francs in compensation. However, in spite of government and industry efforts to gag Dr. Hertel, other evidence concerning the hazards of microwaved foods has surfaced around the globe in peer-reviewed journals. Whether it's concerning the chemical or nutritional changes in the food itself, or the apparent effects of microwaved foods on humans, there are yet more questions to ask about this popular technology.



http://allworldviews.blogspot.com/

Friday, March 09, 2007

Gingrich Affair

Sorry (not really) my narrow minded (actually not narrow minded but rather single issue minded) conservatives, but I have to report this if for no other reason than to point out the continuing hypocrisy of the people you admire most and thus revealing the ease with which they "hook" you with their "lip service".
I know many of the worst of you conservatives long for Gingrich to run for the presidency, and indeed with no real Bush-like maniac yet running, Newt just might.
Newt Gingrich, while leading the wolf pack against Clinton for "messin with Monica" admitted during a recent interview that he himself was having an affair during the process. But Gingrich reasoned, that he is not a hypocrite. He followed this with the "code speak" so sought after by "born again conservative christian radicals by saying "There are times that I have fallen short of my own standards. ..... certainly times when I've fallen short of God's standards."
Thats it; hes got them right where he wants them now. If only they would remove those rose colored glasses and really see the world for once

Labels: , , , , ,

Link

Whale Phenomena

Researchers, found that there are distinct "dialects" of whale-speak in different regions of the ocean. The scientists used recordings to identify nine population regions worldwide. Populations using a "Type 1" call, for example, live within a narrow band of ocean hugging the North American coast, while whales that use a "Type 4" call are spread over a large swath of the Northern Pacific Ocean.
And now onto the sex life of whales, it seems that to female whales, size DOES indeed matter.
Females select mates based on size and estimate that by evaluating males' songs: Larger males can take in more air and hold notes longer. Imagine that; even with the largest mammal on earth, size still matters, sheesh, who'da thunk it.

Link

FBI Lying and Cheating Again!

The FBI underreported to Congess their use of the patriot act. Why am I not surprised. Story here.

Link