The Trouble With the Liberal Left

The news about the riots in France abound. It is in every newspaper worldwide.
I have no need to read these stories. I am way too familiar with them and their causes, for I am a reformed "Liberal Lefty." No excuse but I was young then. Later in lifeI began to swing toward the right until I settled in my current position of "middle of the road moderate", with an occasional leaning to one side or the other, depending on the subject. But I am WAAY overdue in taking a stance on these riots
So, the trouble with the liberal left is that this is what it ultimately leads to. Why though? That is the question where the arguments arise. My feelings are these social insurrections arise from the leftist policy of simply accepting NEITHER blame nor responsibility combined with social policies that do not encourage interest in improving one lot in life. Why strive to improve when the Government will support you, champion your rights and freedoms at all costs ( the costs are showing now). Improving your "social stature" in this type society and government only means that you now must pay a higher percent of the support and upkeep of those under you. you work hard, improve yourself, get a higher paying position in the workforce and your net reward is that after taxes you end up with little more than you had before, and in some cases less.
The remedy: people MUST be held responsible for their action AND inactions. Failure to even try to procure employment WILL result in your hunger and homelessness. The government will NOT and must NOT support these people. "Freedoms" like immigration and FAILURE of these immigrants to assimilate into their new society must be regulated, must be controlled. You cannot have a successful nation where you have "x" number of groups, each living as they wish with no regard for the ways of their new country. "Rights of the people" have led to inferior and inadequate screening of immigrants; they have led to the inability to compel the able bodied to try and find work, Terrorists routinely enter these countries by flaunting the "rights rules" in these countries . The next generation, born into this system see these "freedoms" as their right to do nothing while the government supports them, feed them, clothes the and shelters them.
Then all of a sudden, someone in authority takes action. And the masses revolt! What do you mean I can't throw rocks at the police? What do you mean I have to support myself? What do you mean I have to learn the national language? My parents never did! All of a sudden these "freeloaders" begin to think that its the government who is wrong; the government that is acting illegally. And their not going to stand for it. France is not alone in their problem. Sure they are a glaring example of the failures of liberal left Socialism, but other nations are headed that way. Indeed many must now be wringing their hands worrying if their next. And yes the United States has its problems in this area though they seem to avoid the worst case scenario by throwing in a Republican president now and again to straighten things out.
By now I know that anyone who has faithfully read my blog all along or know me personally are thinking "who is this guy and what have they done with D. Coder"??? Fact is its still me, the real me,; it just seems as if I am a liberal Democrat. In fact I am as I stated earlier a middle of the road moderate. BUT, but I do have a problem with liars, incompetence, and stupidity, hence my anti Bush stance, just as his father before him, both are a$$holes. I mean here is a man, George H. who followed 8 years of the hugely popular Reagan with a four year stint so abysmal that Clinton got in! I mean George H was almost as bas as that peanut farmer we had in the 70's. I voted for and supported Reagan TWICE, yet must admit that Clinton seemed to do a good job economy wise. I do however find truth in the accusations that Clintons INACTION led to the emboldening of terrorists to do the 9/11 tragedy. So even though I really like the slogan "When Clinton lied nobody died" the facts may indeed be otherwise.

My Favorites for 2008 presidential race are Hillary Clinton / Oprah Winfrey vs. John McCain / Rudy Giuliani
I mean this sincerely. I know of no more caring humanitarian with greater connections than Oprah nor a bigger snake than Hillary, and both traits would be necessary to running this nation well.
My McCain / Giuliani pick, well McCain is the better human being, both are slick geniuses with the anatomy necessary to pull the trigger if need be. ( Hillary also I believe has this anatomical trait)
The problem with my Republican picks is Giuliani's ego. Not sure he'd play second fiddle to anybody.