Abortion Questions, help wanted

I was sent an article written by Erika Bachiochi entitled How Abortion Hurts Women: The Hard Proof. This article was written by her for Crisis Magazine and can be read here


After having read it I was left with a number of questions and opinions, for which I look for answers. All opinion and facts are happily accepted, with of course more credence given to the "provable" facts.
the article statements are reprinted below follow by my questions / opinions in CAPITAL LETTERS so as to make it easier to separate the two. Here we go:
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, co-founder of the Breast Cancer Prevention Institute, presents evidence supporting a link between induced abortion and increased risk of breast cancer

MY UNEDUCATED GUESS HERE WOULD BE THAT MISCARRIAGE OUGHT POSSIBLY ALSO INCREASE THAT RISK, NO?
_________________________________________________________________________________
Women who have had abortions suffer an increased risk of anxiety, depression, and suicide.

IS IT NOT ALSO POSSIBLE WITH EQUAL REGULARITY THAT WOMEN WHO HAVE THEIR BABIES AND THUS HAVE TO "GIVE UP" THEIR CURRENT LIVES AND LIFE LONG GOALS, NOT TO MENTION THAT OF THE BABIES DADDY'S LIVES AND GOALS ALSO SUFFER FROM THE ABOVE? THE ONLY WAY FOR HER STATEMENT TO BE ACCURATE IS TO MEASURE THE SAME SYMPTOMS AFTER ABORTION IS NOT AN OPTION, WHEN THE WOMAN AND MAN ARE FORCED TO ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF A BABY. I HAPPEN TO THINK THIS WOULD LEAD TO MUCH MORE anxiety, depression, and suicide, NOT TO MENTION DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITH EACH PARTY BLAMING THE OTHER FOR THEIR PREDICAMENT. YOU SEE IN THE SCENARIO ABOVE WOMEN WHO CARRIED THEIR BABY TO "TERM" DID SO BY "CHOICE" . IN MY SCENARIO I WOULD LIKE TO MEASURE WOMEN'S MENTAL CONDITIONS WHEN FORCED TO CARRY AN UNWANTED BABY TO TERM.
_________________________________________________________________________________

Pre-term birth is associated with low birth-weight babies, and very low birth-weight babies (those born between 20 and 27 weeks) have 38 times the risk of having cerebral palsy—not to mention medical costs 28 times greater —than full-term babies.

WHILE THIS MAY BE TRUE, THIS IS BEING USED AS A SCARE TACTIC.
BOTH MYSELF AND MY SIBLING WERE PREMATURE; I WAS BORN AT 7 MONTHS, MY SIBLING BORN AT 6 MONTHS. BOTH OF US (THANK GOD) ARE NORMAL IN RESPECT TO "MEDICAL COSTS". BOTH OF US ARE NOW "MIDDLE AGED"
_________________________________________________________________________________

We can'’t afford to do the much more difficult work of creating environments that welcome women who have children, —which, of course, is the great majority of women. Instead, we'’ll just continue to tell women what Roe told them a generation before. You choose: your baby or yourself, your baby or your future, your baby or your success; this is a man'’s world, and you better become like a man, —that is, not pregnant —if you want to succeed.

IF THIS UTOPIAN IDEA WERE TO BECOME REALITY, THEN MY REASONS FOR BEING PROCHOICE WOULD DIMINISH. AS IVE STATED MANY TIMES BEFORE, AS A PARENT IM NOT GOING TO, IF POSSIBLE, ALLOW MY CHILD TO RUIN THEIR LIFE GOALS BY DOING ANYTHING DETRIMENTAL TO THAT GOAL, AND THAT INCLUDES HAVING AN UNWANTED BABY.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Women are beginning to realize that they'’d been sold on the idea that a mother is of far less value than a fully engaged professional person.
CERTAINLY EACH IS OF EQUAL VALUE IN THEIR "CHOSEN" ENDEAVOR. HOWEVER IN THE BUSINESS WORLD A "fully engaged professional WOMAN IS INDEED MUCH MORE VALUABLE TO THE BUSINESS THAN THE MOTHER OF YOUNG CHILDREN. THIS IS SO, SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE INCREASED RISK OF TIME MISSED FROM WORK DUE TO "EMERGENCIES" NOT TO MENTION INCREASED EMPLOYER PAID BENEFITS
_________________________________________________________________________________



THE FOLLOWING ARE STATEMENTS I AGREE WITH!
============================================================================
During an era in which motherhood was revered much more than it is today, President Theodore Roosevelt said: [The mother] is the most indispensable component part of society. The work of men, he said, is not “as hard or as responsible as the work of a woman who is bringing up a family of small children.... I think the duty of the woman the more important, the more difficult, and the more honorable of the two.Â

I 100% AGREE WITH THAT STATEMENT WITH DETAILS BEST LEFT FOR ANOTHERDAY SO AS NOT TO TAKE AWAY FROM THE MAIN SUBJECT HERE
_________________________________________________________________________________

Sadly, a feminism that puts the fight for abortion at the center of its crusade has convinced many women that their social status and power are more valuable than the very lives of their children and the influence they have in the world through their work as mothers.
Some social scientists have argued that such a feminism, having driven unprecedented numbers of mothers with small children into the work force full-time over the last few decades, is largely to blame for the difficulty most single mothers today have at making ends meet. After all, the financial power of the dual-income family —the norm today —has driven up the price of life's necessities. While two-parent families with a single income struggle and sacrifice to allow one parent to remain at home with young children, single mothers —responsible for both bread-winning and child-rearing, —are faced with an almost insurmountable financial obstacle.
I AGREE, BUT ANOTHER DAY FOR MY OPINION
_________________________________________________________________________________