.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

The World Unleashed

The Rantings of an unkown prophet can be found here; where no topic is safe! The resident savant will lead you thru the world as he sees it. Not an easy life, but one that MUST be shared, if the mission to "enlighten" is to reach fruition. Commentaries on religion, Catholicism, politics, abortion, evolution, sports, baseball, mets, yankees, entertainment, TV, american idol etc. can all be found here. enjoy it, hate it, come back often, send me your comments. all are welcome

My Photo
Name:

dont let my 1912 birthday bother you, i was born on feb. 29th so i only have birthdays every 4 years. so im only 26

Google
WWW http://allworldviews.blogspot.com/

Monday, February 27, 2006

Was This The Result of the Bush Presidency Also?

As of September 1st, 2005, the state of Texas no longer accepts marriages between first cousins. In fact, the language of the new law now deems first cousin as felons! The civil marriage laws and criminal laws were amended.

But oddly (or not) enough, 19 states still DO allow it, with 6 others allowing it "under certain circumstances." Can it be so far fetched to assume South Dakota is one of the states allowing it "under certain circumstances?" After all that is the 1st state trying to make abortion illegal even in the case of incest, so it only make sense to allow these lovers to marry, right? Taken a step further, I wonder how many of these other states that allow this type of marriage are "blue states" that voted for Bush-whacker a second time? That alone ought to be proof enough that first cousin marriages are bad for your health. I'll have to research that and leave the results as a comment.
Now I cant say for certain if any Bush ancestor ever actually married a first cousin, but circumstantial evidence could certainly lead one to assume so.
And in keeping with Texas tradition of imprisoning large numbers of people, they have also deemed those marrying first cousins as felons, according to the language of the new law.

2 Comments:

Blogger D. Coder said...

Alright so my whole theory on states that voted for Bush, being the ones who allowed first cousin marriage was wrong, as was my theory that South Dakota would probably condone first cousin marriages. But in reseaching I did find the following IQ related stats"
A controversial and refuted list (labeled as a hoax) of states by IQ show the following: 19 of the top 24 states with the highest IQ's voted for Kerry, while the 26 states with the lowest IQ's voted for Bush.
http://chrisevans3d.com/files/iq.htm

But even someone who tried to prove the above stats as a "hoax" comes up with this list:
The 37 states with the highest IQ's were split 20 -17 in favor of Kerry, while 13 of the 14 states with the lowest IQ's still did vote for Bush. So regardless of what list you choose to believe (if any) those with lower IQ's DID indeed vote for Bush. The total of 51 is the result of including the district of Columbia.
http://sq.4mg.com/IQpolitics.htm

So when all is said and done, I had fun with this & it would still appear that the dumber people voted for Bush after all (first cousin marriage not withstanding).

2/27/2006 4:31 AM  
Blogger D. Coder said...

For the sake of credibility i guess i should delete it, but i did enoy writing it. And it was a good "theory". And i can always say that even tho my theory appears to be wrong i'm still sure that those who did vote for Bush were the inbreds, and it would be hard to prove me wrong. And besides nobody reads my blog anyway, so accuracy isn't important then is it?

2/27/2006 4:46 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home